kronosapiens.github.io - Time and Authority

Time and Authority

Kronosapiens.github.io Spined HTML

Time andValidityAbacusWell-nighTime andValiditySep 14, 2017 I. Living together, humans mart ideas. Some of those ideas have staying power. Views concerning good and evil and right self-mastery have been virtually for millenia. Notions of individual self-rule and equal rights have been virtually for centuries. Concepts of gender and racial equality, decades. Ideas come in and out of fashion; some last longer than others. Not all of them are good, and sometimes we have to let them go. Still, we expect people to stick to their beliefs: expressly our leaders and people we depend on. It is treasonous when leaders renege on important issues to suit their firsthand needs. At the same time, we don’t want people to finger like they must perform their beliefs under external pressure. As we change, our attitudes change, and our expression of those attitudes should be self-ruling to transpiration with them. We want freedom. We want stability. How do we wastefulness self and society? If something is good, will it last? If something lasts, is it good? II. Since the end of World War II and the ushering in of the postmodern age, it has wilt the norm to rencontre and disassemble the authorities of yesteryear. An idea which has been passed on for hundreds of years is of the same value as one freshly conceived that morning; it is our intellect, and nothing else, that arbitrates between them. The deconstruction was a cultural breakthrough, but has left us increasingly sensitive to dialectical tensions yet poorly-equipped to resolve them. Ultimately, the postmodern vision has been a souvenir and a curse. We cannot hold ourselves right a priori and we must ultimately find a way to wastefulness flexiblity of thought with a valuing of tradition. The platonic wastefulness is one that allows an individual to transpiration their mind, while at the same time creating some incentive to stick to one’s beliefs. We must find a way to embrace transpiration without fearing destruction. It is easy to speak in generalities; it is nonflexible to put things into action. In an struggle at the latter, we will bring this wastefulness into practice, as a sit-in and extension of this theory of preference graphs. III. To review the language of preference graphs, we an individual , who has preferences written as when prefers over . We can imagine as a preference, or arrow, from from to . Thusfar when aggregating preferences, all preferences are given a weight of 1. Now we introduce a new dimension to preferences: the validity of a preference, a variable weight specified as some function of the time since first expressed the preference .If is an wrong-headed preference and is the time since that preference was first expressed, then the validity of can be specified as: The validity function is intentionally general; any function will do, and the nomination of function will shape our intereptation of the “authority.” Using a monotonically-increasing function, like the logarithm, creates an validity lines which is intuitive and useful. IV. What happens when we incorporate time into applications of preference graphs? Assuming a monotonically-increasing validity function and rational, self-interested participants, we might expect the following. Individuals are incentivized to register their preferences as early as possible. Assume that individuals would like their views to have the maximum impact on the group. In the context of an online using or service, this creates an valuable incentive to prefer the product as early as possible. Individuals will transpiration their preferences less frequently. If an individual changes their preference, the validity of that preference resets. If an individual then decided that their original preference was the right one, the preference resets again, and the piled validity of thier initial preference is lost. There is an incentive to get it right the first time. Individuals will transpiration their preference when their views truly change. There is no goody to holding on to views one no longer agrees with: if an individual truly feels differently well-nigh an issue, then updating their preference will unzip the desired directional affect. In summary, the wing of a time dimension to a preference-aggregation platform creates powerful incentives to both prefer the platform and to behave responsibly once on the platform. It is expressly worth noting that the spare computational complexity associated with incorporating the time dimension is small: . That so many positive effects sally from a simple computation is highly suggestive. Comments Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. Abacus Abacus kronovet@gmail.com kronosapiens kronosapiens I'm Daniel Kronovet, a data scientist living in Tel Aviv.